[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 10:02:57 +0000
From: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>
To: Arun Ramamurthy <arun.ramamurthy@...adcom.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...gle.com>,
Anatol Pomazau <anatol@...gle.com>,
Jonathan Richardson <jonathar@...adcom.com>,
Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
"bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com"
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] video: ARM CLCD: Added dt support to set tim2 register
On Mon, 2015-03-02 at 19:09 +0000, Arun Ramamurthy wrote:
> > The existing bindings intentionally avoided quoting internal registers -
> > they are supposed to describe how the hardware is wired up...
> >
> > So how about something like "arm,pl11x,tft-invert-clac"? Then the driver
> > sets the bit or not, depending on the property existance?
> >
> Sure, I can change it to two properties called arm,pl11x,tft-invert-clac
> and arm,pl11x,tft-clksel. Would that be acceptable?
That would be fine by me :-)
Pawel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists