[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2015 16:07:55 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Cláudio Maia <crrm@...p.ipp.pt>
Cc: thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com, noralf@...nnes.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Staging: fbtft: fb_pcd8544: Fixed coding style
errors and warnings
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 12:54:38PM +0000, Cláudio Maia wrote:
> The following errors were fixed:
>
> ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible
> WARNING: line over 80 characters
>
> Signed-off-by: Cláudio Maia <crrm@...p.ipp.pt>
Can you resend these but split up differently.
> + write_reg(par, 0x22);/*
> + 5:1 1
> + 2:0 PD - Powerdown control: chip is active
> + 1:1 V - Entry mode: vertical addressing
> + 0:0 H - Extended instruction set control: basic
> + */
>
These comments are all kinds of whacky looking. You fix them in the 2/2
patch, but we don't want to have this intermidiate whacky looking patch.
Just send them when they look good like in the 2/2 patch.
> @@ -130,7 +133,8 @@ static int write_vmem(struct fbtft_par *par, size_t offset, size_t len)
> gpio_set_value(par->gpio.dc, 1);
> ret = par->fbtftops.write(par, par->txbuf.buf, 6*84);
> if (ret < 0)
> - dev_err(par->info->device, "%s: write failed and returned: %d\n", __func__, ret);
> + dev_err(par->info->device, "%s: write failed and returned: %d\n",
> + __func__, ret);
Do these non-comment fixes in a separate patch. In other words:
[patch 1/2] break up a few long lines
this patch doesn't touch comments
[patch 2/2] make comments look good
this is 1/2 and 2/2 comment changes combined
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists