lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 3 Mar 2015 14:36:59 +0100
From:	Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To:	Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>
Cc:	iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
	Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
	Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] CHROMIUM: iommu: rockchip: Make sure that page table
 state is coherent

On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 08:19:21PM +0900, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Even though the code uses the dt_lock spin lock to serialize mapping
> operation from different threads, it does not protect from IOMMU
> accesses that might be already taking place and thus altering state
> of the IOTLB. This means that current mapping code which first zaps
> the page table and only then updates it with new mapping which is
> prone to mentioned race.

Could you elabortate a bit on the race and why it is sufficient to zap
only the first and the last iova? From the description and the comments
in the patch this is not clear to me.


	Joerg

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ