lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue,  3 Mar 2015 09:11:14 -0800
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	mingo@...nel.org, laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
	josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
	rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
	dvhart@...ux.intel.com, fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com,
	bobby.prani@...il.com,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/5] rcu: Provide rcu_expedite_gp() and rcu_unexpedite_gp()

From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>

Currently, expediting of normal synchronous grace-period primitives
(synchronize_rcu() and friends) is controlled by the rcu_expedited()
boot/sysfs parameter.  This works well, but does not handle nesting.
This commit therefore provides rcu_expedite_gp() to enable expediting
and rcu_unexpedite_gp() to cancel a prior rcu_expedite_gp(), both of
which support nesting.

Reported-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 include/linux/rcupdate.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
 kernel/rcu/update.c      | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 68 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
index 78097491cd99..57a4d1f73a00 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
@@ -48,6 +48,26 @@
 
 extern int rcu_expedited; /* for sysctl */
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_TINY_RCU
+/* Tiny RCU doesn't expedite, as its purpose in life is instead to be tiny. */
+static inline bool rcu_gp_is_expedited(void)  /* Internal RCU use. */
+{
+	return false;
+}
+
+static inline void rcu_expedite_gp(void)
+{
+}
+
+static inline void rcu_unexpedite_gp(void)
+{
+}
+#else /* #ifdef CONFIG_TINY_RCU */
+bool rcu_gp_is_expedited(void);  /* Internal RCU use. */
+void rcu_expedite_gp(void);
+void rcu_unexpedite_gp(void);
+#endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_TINY_RCU */
+
 enum rcutorture_type {
 	RCU_FLAVOR,
 	RCU_BH_FLAVOR,
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/update.c b/kernel/rcu/update.c
index e0d31a345ee6..5f850823c187 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/update.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/update.c
@@ -62,6 +62,54 @@ MODULE_ALIAS("rcupdate");
 
 module_param(rcu_expedited, int, 0);
 
+#ifndef CONFIG_TINY_RCU
+
+static atomic_t rcu_expedited_nesting;
+
+/*
+ * Should normal grace-period primitives be expedited?  Intended for
+ * use within RCU.  Note that this function takes the rcu_expedited
+ * sysfs/boot variable into account as well as the rcu_expedite_gp()
+ * nesting.  So looping on rcu_unexpedite_gp() until rcu_gp_is_expedited()
+ * returns false is a -really- bad idea.
+ */
+bool rcu_gp_is_expedited(void)
+{
+	return rcu_expedited || atomic_read(&rcu_expedited_nesting);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_gp_is_expedited);
+
+/**
+ * rcu_expedite_gp - Expedite future RCU grace periods
+ *
+ * After a call to this function, future calls to synchronize_rcu() and
+ * friends act as the corresponding synchronize_rcu_expedited() function
+ * had instead been called.
+ */
+void rcu_expedite_gp(void)
+{
+	atomic_inc(&rcu_expedited_nesting);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_expedite_gp);
+
+/**
+ * rcu_unexpedite_gp - Cancel prior rcu_expedite_gp() invocation
+ *
+ * Undo a prior call to rcu_expedite_gp().  If all prior calls to
+ * rcu_expedite_gp() are undone by a subsequent call to rcu_unexpedite_gp(),
+ * and if the rcu_expedited sysfs/boot parameter is not set, then all
+ * subsequent calls to synchronize_rcu() and friends will return to
+ * their normal non-expedited behavior.
+ */
+void rcu_unexpedite_gp(void)
+{
+	atomic_dec(&rcu_expedited_nesting);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_unexpedite_gp);
+
+#endif /* #ifndef CONFIG_TINY_RCU */
+
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU
 
 /*
-- 
1.8.1.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ