lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 3 Mar 2015 20:49:16 +0100
From:	Arend van Spriel <arend@...adcom.com>
To:	Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
CC:	"Fu, Zhonghui" <zhonghui.fu@...ux.intel.com>,
	Pat Erley <pat-lkml@...ey.org>, <brudley@...adcom.com>,
	Franky Lin <frankyl@...adcom.com>, <meuleman@...adcom.com>,
	<linville@...driver.com>, <pieterpg@...adcom.com>,
	<hdegoede@...hat.com>, <wens@...e.org>,
	<linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
	<brcm80211-dev-list@...adcom.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] brcmfmac: avoid duplicated suspend/resume operation

On 03/02/15 16:08, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Arend van Spriel<arend@...adcom.com>  writes:
>
>>> Now that there is not 3.20 version. My understanding is that this
>>> patch will be in linus' tree 4.1-rc1, right?
>>
>> Yes. It will go into linux-next first, which you can consider to be an
>> incubator where all stuff for the next release is integrated. Stuff
>> will be added there until 4.0 is released. At that moment the merge
>> window starts which moves all the stuff from linux-next into the
>> mainline linux repo to prepare 4.1-rc1.
>>
>> Now regarding your patch I have to give a heads up. Our pending
>> patches have been applied by Kalle and includes similar fix.
>
> Yeah, Zhonghui's patch doesn't apply anymore. There is similar code in
> wireless-drivers-next but still a bit different. So what should we do?
> Is the driver ok now?

The idea of Zhonghui's patch was to avoid entering suspend and resume 
callbacks twice. The current behavior is same as his patch intended so 
yes the driver is ok (pending undiscovered bugs :-p ).

Regards,
Arend
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ