linux-kernel - Re: regcache_sync() errors for read-only registers cache

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 3 Mar 2015 20:04:26 +0000
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: regcache_sync() errors for read-only registers cache

On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 04:33:21PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> Mark Brown wrote:

> > Why should adding something to the defaults hurt performance (it should
> > just be a one time cost to insert the default which we've got a
> > reasonable chance of making back later)?  I guess if there's a lot of
> > these registers it'll add up but they're pretty rare, usually it's a few
> > ID and revision registers and anything else is volatile so wouldn't get
> > cached at all.

> I caught this bug because of the currently developed HD-audio regmap
> support that has lots of read-only stuff (mostly for parameters, dozen
> of such per each widget node).  Registers range of 32bit wide and
> there are no static default values that can be stored in a flat
> table.  Nasty, eh?  I'll be glad if any better workaround is present
> in regmap.

Well, if they're quick to read marking them as volatile to avoid the
cache would be the obvious thing, or not caring about writeability.

You can also specify num_reg_defaults_raw with no defaults table and
it'll read the hardware in one fell swoop, though that would need some
improvement for sparse registers and probably won't do the right thing
for the other registers either (it's a bit specialist for PMICs).

> I can resend the patch if you prefer, of course, if the original patch
> is OK.  Just let me know.

Yes, please resend - I'd guess you want to fix the block case too?

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)