[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54F617AD.6070208@wwwdotorg.org>
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 13:21:01 -0700
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
CC: linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] pinctrl: tegra: driver layout/consistency fixes
On 02/24/2015 02:00 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
>
> Various non-semantic tweaks and layout/consistency fixes for existing
> Tegra pinctrl drivers.
>
> Move the definition of DRV_PINGROUP_REG() before the definition of
> PINGROUP() so that a future SoC driver can invoke the former from the
> latter.
>
> PINGROUP_BIT_Y(n) is just n, so replace it with n.
>
> Re-wrap the parameters to *PINGROUP().
>
> Keep various enums sorted in the Tegra124 driver.
>
> Various white-space consistency fixes.
>
> These changes aim to update existing drivers to be consistent with future
> SoC drivers. While we could ignore these tweaks to the existing drivers,
> I'd like to keep everything as consistent as possible for easy comparison.
> Besides, I auto-generate the drivers, and maintaining special-cases to
> keep the differences in place is annoying.
Linus, does this series look OK?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists