[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150304150815.GG3989@piout.net>
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 16:08:15 +0100
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/9] watchdog: at91rm9200: use the system timer syscon
On 04/03/2015 at 06:51:51 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote :
> >@@ -267,7 +276,7 @@ static struct platform_driver at91wdt_driver = {
> > .suspend = at91wdt_suspend,
> > .resume = at91wdt_resume,
> > .driver = {
> >- .name = "at91_wdt",
> >+ .name = "atmel_st_watchdog",
>
> If you change the driver name you also need to change the MODULE_ALIAS
> a few lines down.
>
> But why change it in the first place ? Maybe that was discussed somewhere,
> but not here where it belongs, and not in patch 0/9 either.
>
That's because it conflicts with drivers/watchdog/at91sam9_wdt.c
I'm not sure that is relevant anymore as they will only be probed using
DT now.
--
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists