[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150304152243.GG3122@htj.duckdns.org>
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 10:22:43 -0500
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH block/for-4.0-fixes] writeback: add missing INITIAL_JIFFIES
init in global_update_bandwidth()
global_update_bandwidth() uses static variable update_time as the
timestamp for the last update but forgets to initialize it to
INITIALIZE_JIFFIES.
This means that global_dirty_limit will be 5 mins into the future on
32bit and some large amount jiffies into the past on 64bit. This
isn't critical as the only effect is that global_dirty_limit won't be
updated for the first 5 mins after booting on 32bit machines,
especially given the auxiliary nature of global_dirty_limit's role -
protecting against global dirty threshold's sudden dips; however, it
does lead to unintended suboptimal behavior. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
---
mm/page-writeback.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/mm/page-writeback.c
+++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
@@ -922,7 +922,7 @@ static void global_update_bandwidth(unsi
unsigned long now)
{
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(dirty_lock);
- static unsigned long update_time;
+ static unsigned long update_time = INITIAL_JIFFIES;
/*
* check locklessly first to optimize away locking for the most time
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists