[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54F72555.30304@suse.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2015 16:31:33 +0100
From: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com,
konrad.wilk@...cle.com, boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, cyliu@...e.com
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/4] usb: Introduce Xen pvUSB backend
On 03/04/2015 04:27 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 02:31:08PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 03/02/2015 12:39 PM, David Vrabel wrote:
>>> On 26/02/15 13:35, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>>> Introduces the Xen pvUSB backend. With pvUSB it is possible for a Xen
>>>> domU to communicate with a USB device assigned to that domU. The
>>>> communication is all done via the pvUSB backend in a driver domain
>>>> (usually Dom0) which is owner of the physical device.
>>>
>>> Why do we need a kernel usb backend instead of a user-space one using
>>> libusb?
>>
>> Good question. At a first glance libusb seems to offer most/all needed
>> interfaces. The main question is whether performance with libusb will
>> be okay. There will be one additional copy of the I/O data needed if
>> I've read the code in drivers/usb/core/devio.c correctly.
>
> You can drive USB devices at line speed using libusb just fine. Try it
> out and see please, processors copy data _very_ fast these days.
Okay, thanks for the information.
I'll take this as a hint to try the user space variant. :-)
Juergen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists