[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150304171505.GH3989@piout.net>
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 18:15:05 +0100
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] ARM: at91: remove SoC headers
On 04/03/2015 at 18:03:45 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote :
> On Wednesday 04 March 2015 15:47:25 Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > @@ -21,6 +21,14 @@
> > #include "generic.h"
> > #include "soc.h"
> >
> > +#define SAMA5D4_BASE_USART3 0xfc00c000 /* (USART3 non-secure) Base Address */
> > +#define SAMA5D4_BASE_PMC 0xf0018000 /* (PMC) Base Address */
> > +#define SAMA5D4_BASE_MPDDRC 0xf0010000 /* (MPDDRC) Base Address */
> > +#define SAMA5D4_BASE_PIOD 0xfc068000 /* (PIOD) Base Address */
> > +
> > +/* Some other peripherals */
> > +#define SAMA5D4_BASE_SYS2 SAMA5D4_BASE_PIOD
> >
>
> Why are these still needed? I would expect that the code using them
> can be removed as well.
>
Yeah, that is still something I need to investigate. Nicolas told me it
doesn't work without it. My guess is that it has something to do with
secure booting.
--
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists