linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3.18 129/151] x86/xen: Treat SCI interrupt as normal GSI interrupt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150304181424.GC13218@kroah.com>
Date:	Wed, 4 Mar 2015 10:14:24 -0800
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@...onical.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>,
	Sander Eikelenboom <linux@...elenboom.it>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
	David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.18 129/151] x86/xen: Treat SCI interrupt as normal GSI
 interrupt

On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 01:51:53PM +0100, Stefan Bader wrote:
> On 04.03.2015 07:14, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > 3.18-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> 
> I thought I replied earlier today but I cannot seem to find it coming back via
> the mailing list. Hope this is not duplicating too much... There was a
> regression with that patch and it requires the below commit as well to prevent that:
> 
> commit 1ea76fbadd667b19c4fa4466f3a3b55a505e83d9
> Author: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>
> Date:   Mon Feb 16 10:11:13 2015 +0800
> 
>     x86/irq: Fix regression caused by commit b568b8601f05
> 
>     Commit b568b8601f05 ("Treat SCI interrupt as normal GSI interrupt")
>     accidently removes support of legacy PIC interrupt when fixing a
>     regression for Xen, which causes a nasty regression on HP/Compaq
>     nc6000 where we fail to register the ACPI interrupt, and thus
>     lose eg. thermal notifications leading a potentially overheated
>     machine.

Thanks for this, now applied.

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/