[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150304184318.GE22156@leverpostej>
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 18:43:18 +0000
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>,
"linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org" <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
"rtc-linux@...glegroups.com" <rtc-linux@...glegroups.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
"linux-serial@...r.kernel.org" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] ARM: at91: fix irq_pm_install_action WARNING
Hi Boris,
Other than the watchdog patch, which I'm a little confused by, this all
looks fine to me. So for the other patches:
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Sorry I haven't replied to anything for the last few days, and thanks
for digging into this.
Thanks,
Mark.
On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 09:18:12AM +0000, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> My apologies to those of you who already received this series, but I
> didn't increment the patch version and forgot some subsystem maintainers
> and MLs.
>
> Commit cab303be91dc47942bc25de33dc1140123540800 [1] introduced a WARN_ON
> test which triggers a WARNING backtrace on at91 platforms.
> While this WARN_ON is absolutely necessary to warn users that they should
> not mix request with and without IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flags on shared IRQs,
> there is no easy way to solve this issue on at91 platforms.
>
> The main reason is that the init timer is often using a shared irq line
> and thus request this irq with IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag set, while other
> peripherals request the same irq line without this flag.
>
> This problem has recently been addressed by this patch [2] which adds
> a new IRQF_COND_SUSPEND flag, that authorize mixing IRQF_NO_SUSPEND and
> !IRQF_NO_SUSPEND as long as irq handlers setting IRQF_COND_SUSPEND
> can safely be called in suspended state.
>
> Doing this also implies taking care of system wakeup in devices handlers
> if they tag the IRQ line as a wakeup source.
> The first patch of this series exports the pm_system_wakeup symbol so
> that drivers can call pm_system_wakeup from their interrupt handler.
>
> This series then patches all at91 drivers that can have devices sharing
> their IRQ line with a timer.
>
> This series depends on [2].
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Boris
>
> [1]https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/kernel/irq/pm.c?id=cab303be91dc47942bc25de33dc1140123540800
> [2]https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/2/26/675
>
> Changes since v1:
> - replaced the IRQF_SUSPEND_NOACTION flag by IRQF_COND_SUSPEND
> - properly addressed wakeup handling in drivers
>
> Boris Brezillon (6):
> PM / wakeup: export pm_system_wakeup symbol
> rtc: at91sam9: rework wakeup and interrupt handling
> rtc: at91rm9200: rework wakeup and interrupt handling
> clk: at91: implement suspend/resume for the PMC irqchip
> watchdog: at91sam9: request the irq with IRQF_NO_SUSPEND
> tty: serial: atmel: rework interrupt and wakeup handling
>
> drivers/base/power/wakeup.c | 1 +
> drivers/clk/at91/pmc.c | 20 ++++++++++-
> drivers/clk/at91/pmc.h | 1 +
> drivers/rtc/rtc-at91rm9200.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> drivers/rtc/rtc-at91sam9.c | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++---
> drivers/watchdog/at91sam9_wdt.c | 3 +-
> 7 files changed, 177 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 1.9.1
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists