[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1425500461.3838.140.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2015 20:21:01 +0000
From: Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"Li, Aubrey" <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Len.Brown@...el.com,
x86@...nel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Bypass legacy PIC and PIT on ACPI hardware reduced
platform
On Wed, 2015-03-04 at 15:05 +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 03:16:07PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Sort of. What we need is a "do not touch PIC/PIT" bit for the code that
> > tries to fall back to them in some cases (which may appear to work if
> > the hardware is physically there, but it may confuse the platform).
>
> Can "some cases" detection be nicely put into a x86_platform
> platform-specific method?
In some cases they don't belong in x86, ACPI is also used for ARM64.
However
if ( has_8259_pic() )
is trivally 0, 1 or some platform or acpi provided method.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists