linux-kernel - Re: nios2: is the ptrace ABI correct?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <54F7717C.5070406@vanguardiasur.com.ar>
Date:	Wed, 04 Mar 2015 17:56:28 -0300
From:	Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@...guardiasur.com.ar>
To:	Chung-Lin Tang <cltang@...esourcery.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Ley Foon Tan <lftan@...era.com>
CC:	Tobias Klauser <tklauser@...tanz.ch>,
	Walter Goossens <waltergoossens@...e.nl>,
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	"nios2-dev@...ts.rocketboards.org" <nios2-dev@...ts.rocketboards.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: nios2: is the ptrace ABI correct?

Hi all,

I have here a patch to rework most of the UAPI headers, so the info
exported to userspace is sane. The ABI itself is left untouched.

This will allow to support strace (which is ready since a few weeks now)
and will sanitize the UAPIs. The ABI itself is ugly as hell, but I don't
want to break it.

Given the lack of replies on this thread, I guess nobody cares much
about nios2 mainline. Anyway... I'll try to submit a patchset soon and
I'll appreciate if the libc can take a look and make sure everything is OK.
-- 
Ezequiel Garcia, VanguardiaSur
www.vanguardiasur.com.ar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/