linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] memcg: make CONFIG_MEMCG depend on CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 4 Mar 2015 13:07:54 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To:	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
cc:	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Chen Gang <762976180@...com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memcg: make CONFIG_MEMCG depend on CONFIG_MMU

On Wed, 4 Mar 2015, Michal Hocko wrote:

> Does it really make sense to do this minor tweaks when the configuration
> is barely usable and we are not aware of anybody actually using it in
> the real life?
> 

If the memcg kmem extension continues to be improved, I'm wondering if 
anybody would want to use memcg only for kmem limiting.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/