linux-kernel - Re: [RFC v2 3/4] locks: Split insert/delete block functions into flock/posix parts

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 04 Mar 2015 22:13:37 +0100
From:	Daniel Wagner <wagi@...om.org>
To:	Jeff Layton <jlayton@...chiereds.net>,
	Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@...-carit.de>
CC:	Jeff Layton <jlayton@...marydata.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 3/4] locks: Split insert/delete block functions into
 flock/posix parts

On 03/04/2015 10:01 PM, Jeff Layton wrote:
> I pulled down the most recent Fedora rawhide kernel today:
>
>      4.0.0-0.rc2.git0.1.fc23.x86_64
>
> ...and with that, I can't reproduce this. The ftrace_event_field slab
> (which is shared by the fasync_struct cache) seems to stay under
> control. I see it hover around 3-4M in size while the test is running
> but the box isn't falling over or anything.
>
> Perhaps this was an MM or RCU bug that is now fixed? Can you confirm
> whether you're still able to reproduce it with the most recent mainline
> kernels?

Sure, I'll give tomorrow a spin.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/