[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150304214055.GB7247@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 22:40:55 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>,
Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/16] x86: entry.S: simplify optimistic SYSRET
* Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
> From: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
>
> Avoid redundant load of %r11 (it is already loaded a few instructions before).
Note, this comment is incorrect:
> Do not needlessly increment %rsp - we are going to return to
> userspace via SYSRET, this insn doesn't use stack for return.
The reason we don't need to increment %rsp because in the very next
instruction we are restoring it, and then do we execute a SYSRET:
So instead of:
add $0x80, %rsp
mov 0x18(%rsp), %rsp
we can do a simplified:
mov 0x98(%rsp), %rsp
to get the same result.
(I've clarified the changelog with this when applying the patch.)
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists