[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20150304141305.06bc7cc7bdb0d8233d9aae97@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 14:13:05 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>, Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] zram: introduce automatic device_id generation
On Wed, 4 Mar 2015 23:16:41 +0900 Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com> wrote:
> +static ssize_t zram_add_show(struct class *class,
> + struct class_attribute *attr,
> + char *buf)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&zram_index_mutex);
> + /* read operation on zram_add is - pick up device_id
> + * automatically, add corresponding device and return
> + * that device_id back to user */
> + ret = zram_add(-1);
> + mutex_unlock(&zram_index_mutex);
> +
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> + return scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%d\n", ret);
> +}
Please don't invent new commenting styles. Because doing so inevitably
creates a mixed-up mess, which is what we now have.
--- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c~zram-introduce-automatic-device_id-generation-fix
+++ a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
@@ -1281,9 +1281,10 @@ static ssize_t zram_add_show(struct clas
int ret;
mutex_lock(&zram_index_mutex);
- /* read operation on zram_add is - pick up device_id
- * automatically, add corresponding device and return
- * that device_id back to user */
+ /*
+ * read operation on zram_add is - pick up device_id automatically, add
+ * corresponding device and return that device_id back to user
+ */
ret = zram_add(-1);
mutex_unlock(&zram_index_mutex);
_
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists