[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1425512923.5200.318.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2015 16:48:43 -0700
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
To: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch v4 21/23] x86/PCI: Refine the way to release PCI IRQ
resources
On Wed, 2015-03-04 at 09:06 -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm getting a regression from this patch when using VFIO for device
> assignment to a QEMU VM. I have a device initially bound to the nouveau
> driver, which is unbound from that driver and bound to vfio-pci for use
> by userspace. vfio-pci calls pci_enable_device, but when userspace
> attempts to setup the legacy INTx interrupt, pci_dev->irq is zero and
> vfio-pci errors with -ENODEV.
>
> Where is pci_dev->irq supposed to be getting re-initialized in this
> case? Am I missing an important initialization step in vfio-pci? I
> certainly don't think I should be calling request_irq(pci_dev->irq, ...
> when pci_dev->irq is zero. Thanks,
It looks like the imbalance is in pci_dev->enable_cnt. Any call to
pci_disable_device() will clear pci_dev->irq, but pci_enable_device()
does effectively nothing unless it's called with enable_cnt == zero. So
I'm at the mercy of the previous driver behaving relatively sanely in
order to re-enable legacy interrupts for a device :-\ Maybe the unbound
notifier needs to do some sanitizing of the device? Thanks,
Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists