linux-kernel - Re: Linux XIA

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150304054924.GA27610@kroah.com>
Date:	Tue, 3 Mar 2015 21:49:24 -0800
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Michel Machado <michel@...irati.com.br>
Cc:	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux XIA - merge proposal

On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 07:31:58PM -0500, Michel Machado wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
> 
> >>We're fine with clearly marking Linux XIA as being under staging
> >>as well as helping to define this review process for network stacks.
> >
> >With regard to staging, the code there is usually horrible and I'm
> >not sure anyone really looks there, that would mitigate the review
> >problem to the time when you try to get it out from there, so I'm
> >not sure it brings anything. ;)
> 
>    I suggested staging as a way to incrementally review the code.

Yet you failed to at least ask the maintainer of the staging portion of
the kernel, if this is a valid use of staging, and his resources...

Not nice :(

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/