[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150304012211.GV29656@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 01:22:12 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Daniel Ehrenberg <dehrenberg@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@...omium.org>,
Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@...guardiasur.com.ar>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] vfs: Use 12:20 bit major:minor in stat everywhere
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 05:10:22PM -0800, Daniel Ehrenberg wrote:
> > What's to guarantee that your ABI change won't break any of those?
>
> I guess it's impossible to guarantee, but if there is an error, it'll
> be that an -EOVERFLOW error is suppressed and the high bits of the
> major:minor pair are shaved off by the userspace program. I would
> suspect that this would just make debugging harder, rather than
> actually break an automated program which counts on getting EOVERFLOW
> from a huge block device, but no way to know. The block device has to
> actually exist for this to happen, and all we're talking about is stat
> failing. So it's replacing an an error code with erroneous way to get
> data about a device node (erroneous just because userspace ignores
> some of the bits with the answer).
All it takes is more than 16 SCSI disks, AFAICS, and use of open-coded
MINOR() somewhere in old userland code...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists