[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150304080210.GA12265@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 09:02:10 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/3] x86: Add this_cpu_sp0() to read sp0 for the current cpu
* Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
> We currently store references to the top of the kernel stack in
> multiple places: kernel_stack (with an offset) and
> init_tss.x86_tss.sp0 (no offset). The latter is defined by hardware
> and is a clean canonical way to find the top of the stack. Add an
Btw., 'per_cpu(init_tss)' is a somewhat misleading name these days, as
there's nothing 'init' about it anymore - we load it during CPU init
and then manually maintain its contents. A better name would be
'current_tss' - referring to both the current CPU and the current
task?
> This needs minor paravirt tweaks to ensure that On native, sp0
nit: s/On/on/
> defines the top of the kernel stack. On Xen and lguest, the
> hypervisor tracks it, but we want to start reading sp0 in the
> kernel. Fixing this is simple: just update our local copy of sp0 as
> well as the hypervisor's copy on task switches.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists