[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20150304054615.021452481@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2015 22:06:33 -0800
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>,
Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@...achi.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.10 30/53] cfq-iosched: fix incorrect filing of rt async cfqq
3.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
commit c6ce194325cef342313e3d27620411ce90a89c50 upstream.
Hi,
If you can manage to submit an async write as the first async I/O from
the context of a process with realtime scheduling priority, then a
cfq_queue is allocated, but filed into the wrong async_cfqq bucket. It
ends up in the best effort array, but actually has realtime I/O
scheduling priority set in cfqq->ioprio.
The reason is that cfq_get_queue assumes the default scheduling class and
priority when there is no information present (i.e. when the async cfqq
is created):
static struct cfq_queue *
cfq_get_queue(struct cfq_data *cfqd, bool is_sync, struct cfq_io_cq *cic,
struct bio *bio, gfp_t gfp_mask)
{
const int ioprio_class = IOPRIO_PRIO_CLASS(cic->ioprio);
const int ioprio = IOPRIO_PRIO_DATA(cic->ioprio);
cic->ioprio starts out as 0, which is "invalid". So, class of 0
(IOPRIO_CLASS_NONE) is passed to cfq_async_queue_prio like so:
async_cfqq = cfq_async_queue_prio(cfqd, ioprio_class, ioprio);
static struct cfq_queue **
cfq_async_queue_prio(struct cfq_data *cfqd, int ioprio_class, int ioprio)
{
switch (ioprio_class) {
case IOPRIO_CLASS_RT:
return &cfqd->async_cfqq[0][ioprio];
case IOPRIO_CLASS_NONE:
ioprio = IOPRIO_NORM;
/* fall through */
case IOPRIO_CLASS_BE:
return &cfqd->async_cfqq[1][ioprio];
case IOPRIO_CLASS_IDLE:
return &cfqd->async_idle_cfqq;
default:
BUG();
}
}
Here, instead of returning a class mapped from the process' scheduling
priority, we get back the bucket associated with IOPRIO_CLASS_BE.
Now, there is no queue allocated there yet, so we create it:
cfqq = cfq_find_alloc_queue(cfqd, is_sync, cic, bio, gfp_mask);
That function ends up doing this:
cfq_init_cfqq(cfqd, cfqq, current->pid, is_sync);
cfq_init_prio_data(cfqq, cic);
cfq_init_cfqq marks the priority as having changed. Then, cfq_init_prio
data does this:
ioprio_class = IOPRIO_PRIO_CLASS(cic->ioprio);
switch (ioprio_class) {
default:
printk(KERN_ERR "cfq: bad prio %x\n", ioprio_class);
case IOPRIO_CLASS_NONE:
/*
* no prio set, inherit CPU scheduling settings
*/
cfqq->ioprio = task_nice_ioprio(tsk);
cfqq->ioprio_class = task_nice_ioclass(tsk);
break;
So we basically have two code paths that treat IOPRIO_CLASS_NONE
differently, which results in an RT async cfqq filed into a best effort
bucket.
Attached is a patch which fixes the problem. I'm not sure how to make
it cleaner. Suggestions would be welcome.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
Tested-by: Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@...achi.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
block/cfq-iosched.c | 9 +++++++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/block/cfq-iosched.c
+++ b/block/cfq-iosched.c
@@ -3646,12 +3646,17 @@ static struct cfq_queue *
cfq_get_queue(struct cfq_data *cfqd, bool is_sync, struct cfq_io_cq *cic,
struct bio *bio, gfp_t gfp_mask)
{
- const int ioprio_class = IOPRIO_PRIO_CLASS(cic->ioprio);
- const int ioprio = IOPRIO_PRIO_DATA(cic->ioprio);
+ int ioprio_class = IOPRIO_PRIO_CLASS(cic->ioprio);
+ int ioprio = IOPRIO_PRIO_DATA(cic->ioprio);
struct cfq_queue **async_cfqq = NULL;
struct cfq_queue *cfqq = NULL;
if (!is_sync) {
+ if (!ioprio_valid(cic->ioprio)) {
+ struct task_struct *tsk = current;
+ ioprio = task_nice_ioprio(tsk);
+ ioprio_class = task_nice_ioclass(tsk);
+ }
async_cfqq = cfq_async_queue_prio(cfqd, ioprio_class, ioprio);
cfqq = *async_cfqq;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists