| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2015 11:38:31 +0100
From: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...sung.com>
To: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
Cc: rui.zhang@...el.com, edubezval@...il.com, kgene@...nel.org,
b.zolnierkie@...sung.com, amit.daniel@...sung.com,
a.kesavan@...sung.com, inki.dae@...sung.com,
chanho61.park@...sung.com, kyungmin.park@...sung.com,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] thermal: exynos: Add the support for Exynos5433 TMU
Hi Chanwoo,
> This patch adds the support for Exynos5433's TMU (Thermal Management
> Unit). Exynos5433 has a little different register bit fields as
> following description:
> - Support the eight trip points for rising/falling interrupt by using
> two registers
> - Read the calibration type (1-point or 2-point) and sensor id from
> TRIMINFO register
> - Use a little different register address
>
> Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
> Cc: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
> ---
> drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c | 161
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 157
> insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c index 1d30b09..1bb2fb7 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> @@ -97,6 +97,32 @@
> #define EXYNOS4412_MUX_ADDR_VALUE 6
> #define EXYNOS4412_MUX_ADDR_SHIFT 20
>
> +/* Exynos5433 specific registers */
> +#define EXYNOS5433_TMU_REG_CONTROL1 0x024
> +#define EXYNOS5433_TMU_SAMPLING_INTERVAL 0x02c
> +#define EXYNOS5433_TMU_COUNTER_VALUE0 0x030
> +#define EXYNOS5433_TMU_COUNTER_VALUE1 0x034
> +#define EXYNOS5433_TMU_REG_CURRENT_TEMP1 0x044
> +#define EXYNOS5433_THD_TEMP_RISE3_0 0x050
> +#define EXYNOS5433_THD_TEMP_RISE7_4 0x054
> +#define EXYNOS5433_THD_TEMP_FALL3_0 0x060
> +#define EXYNOS5433_THD_TEMP_FALL7_4 0x064
> +#define EXYNOS5433_TMU_REG_INTEN 0x0c0
> +#define EXYNOS5433_TMU_REG_INTPEND 0x0c8
> +#define EXYNOS5433_TMU_EMUL_CON 0x110
> +#define EXYNOS5433_TMU_PD_DET_EN 0x130
> +
> +#define EXYNOS5433_TRIMINFO_SENSOR_ID_SHIFT 16
> +#define EXYNOS5433_TRIMINFO_CALIB_SEL_SHIFT 23
> +#define EXYNOS5433_TRIMINFO_SENSOR_ID_MASK \
> + (0xf << EXYNOS5433_TRIMINFO_SENSOR_ID_SHIFT)
> +#define EXYNOS5433_TRIMINFO_CALIB_SEL_MASK BIT(23)
> +
> +#define EXYNOS5433_TRIMINFO_ONE_POINT_TRIMMING 0
> +#define EXYNOS5433_TRIMINFO_TWO_POINT_TRIMMING 1
> +
> +#define EXYNOS5433_PD_DET_EN 1
> +
> /*exynos5440 specific registers*/
> #define EXYNOS5440_TMU_S0_7_TRIM 0x000
> #define EXYNOS5440_TMU_S0_7_CTRL 0x020
> @@ -484,6 +510,101 @@ out:
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static int exynos5433_tmu_initialize(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct exynos_tmu_data *data = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> + struct exynos_tmu_platform_data *pdata = data->pdata;
> + struct thermal_zone_device *tz = data->tzd;
> + unsigned int status, trim_info;
> + unsigned int rising_threshold = 0, falling_threshold = 0;
> + unsigned long temp, temp_hist;
> + int ret = 0, threshold_code, i, sensor_id, cal_type;
> +
> + status = readb(data->base + EXYNOS_TMU_REG_STATUS);
> + if (!status) {
> + ret = -EBUSY;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + trim_info = readl(data->base + EXYNOS_TMU_REG_TRIMINFO);
> + sanitize_temp_error(data, trim_info);
> +
> + /* Read the temperature sensor id */
> + sensor_id = (trim_info & EXYNOS5433_TRIMINFO_SENSOR_ID_MASK)
> + >>
> EXYNOS5433_TRIMINFO_SENSOR_ID_SHIFT;
> + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Temperature sensor ID: 0x%x\n",
> sensor_id); +
Isn't dev_info a bit too noisy? IMHO, dev_dbg would be enough
here.
Please consider this globally.
> + /* Read the calibration mode */
> + writel(trim_info, data->base + EXYNOS_TMU_REG_TRIMINFO);
> + cal_type = (trim_info & EXYNOS5433_TRIMINFO_CALIB_SEL_MASK)
> + >>
> EXYNOS5433_TRIMINFO_CALIB_SEL_SHIFT; +
> + switch (cal_type) {
> + case EXYNOS5433_TRIMINFO_ONE_POINT_TRIMMING:
> + pdata->cal_type = TYPE_ONE_POINT_TRIMMING;
> + break;
> + case EXYNOS5433_TRIMINFO_TWO_POINT_TRIMMING:
> + pdata->cal_type = TYPE_TWO_POINT_TRIMMING;
> + break;
> + default:
> + pdata->cal_type = TYPE_ONE_POINT_TRIMMING;
> + break;
> + };
> +
> + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Calibration type is %d-point
> calibration\n",
> + cal_type ? 2 : 1);
> +
> + /* Write temperature code for rising and falling threshold */
> + for (i = 0; i < of_thermal_get_ntrips(tz); i++) {
> + int rising_reg_offset, falling_reg_offset;
> + int j = 0;
> +
> + switch (i) {
> + case 0:
> + case 1:
> + case 2:
> + case 3:
> + rising_reg_offset =
> EXYNOS5433_THD_TEMP_RISE3_0;
> + falling_reg_offset =
> EXYNOS5433_THD_TEMP_FALL3_0;
> + j = i;
> + break;
> + case 4:
> + case 5:
> + case 6:
> + case 7:
> + rising_reg_offset =
> EXYNOS5433_THD_TEMP_RISE7_4;
> + falling_reg_offset =
> EXYNOS5433_THD_TEMP_FALL7_4;
> + j = i - 4;
> + break;
> + default:
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> + /* Write temperature code for rising threshold */
> + tz->ops->get_trip_temp(tz, i, &temp);
> + temp /= MCELSIUS;
> + threshold_code = temp_to_code(data, temp);
> +
> + rising_threshold = readl(data->base +
> rising_reg_offset);
> + rising_threshold |= (threshold_code << j * 8);
> + writel(rising_threshold, data->base +
> rising_reg_offset); +
> + /* Write temperature code for falling threshold */
> + tz->ops->get_trip_hyst(tz, i, &temp_hist);
> + temp_hist = temp - (temp_hist / MCELSIUS);
> + threshold_code = temp_to_code(data, temp_hist);
> +
> + falling_threshold = readl(data->base +
> falling_reg_offset);
> + falling_threshold &= ~(0xff << j * 8);
> + falling_threshold |= (threshold_code << j * 8);
> + writel(falling_threshold, data->base +
> falling_reg_offset);
> + }
> +
> + data->tmu_clear_irqs(data);
> +out:
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> static int exynos5440_tmu_initialize(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct exynos_tmu_data *data = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> @@ -682,7 +803,8 @@ static void exynos7_tmu_control(struct
> platform_device *pdev, bool on)
> if (on) {
> con |= (1 << EXYNOS_TMU_CORE_EN_SHIFT);
> - con |= (1 << EXYNOS7_PD_DET_EN_SHIFT);
> + if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS7)
> + con |= (1 << EXYNOS7_PD_DET_EN_SHIFT);
Isn't exynos7 implying that we already have SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS7?
Why do we need this extra check?
> interrupt_en =
> (of_thermal_is_trip_valid(tz, 7)
> << EXYNOS7_TMU_INTEN_RISE7_SHIFT) |
> @@ -705,11 +827,20 @@ static void exynos7_tmu_control(struct
> platform_device *pdev, bool on) interrupt_en <<
> EXYNOS_TMU_INTEN_FALL0_SHIFT; } else {
> con &= ~(1 << EXYNOS_TMU_CORE_EN_SHIFT);
> - con &= ~(1 << EXYNOS7_PD_DET_EN_SHIFT);
> + if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS7)
> + con &= ~(1 << EXYNOS7_PD_DET_EN_SHIFT);
> interrupt_en = 0; /* Disable all interrupts */
> }
>
> - writel(interrupt_en, data->base + EXYNOS7_TMU_REG_INTEN);
> + if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5433) {
> + int pd_det_en = on ? EXYNOS5433_PD_DET_EN : 0;
> +
> + writel(pd_det_en, data->base +
> EXYNOS5433_TMU_PD_DET_EN);
> + writel(interrupt_en, data->base +
> EXYNOS5433_TMU_REG_INTEN);
> + } else {
> + writel(interrupt_en, data->base +
> EXYNOS7_TMU_REG_INTEN);
> + }
> +
> writel(con, data->base + EXYNOS_TMU_REG_CONTROL);
> }
>
> @@ -770,6 +901,8 @@ static void exynos4412_tmu_set_emulation(struct
> exynos_tmu_data *data,
> if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5260)
> emul_con = EXYNOS5260_EMUL_CON;
> + if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5433)
> + emul_con = EXYNOS5433_TMU_EMUL_CON;
> else if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS7)
> emul_con = EXYNOS7_TMU_REG_EMUL_CON;
> else
> @@ -882,6 +1015,9 @@ static void exynos4210_tmu_clear_irqs(struct
> exynos_tmu_data *data) } else if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS7) {
> tmu_intstat = EXYNOS7_TMU_REG_INTPEND;
> tmu_intclear = EXYNOS7_TMU_REG_INTPEND;
> + } else if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5433) {
> + tmu_intstat = EXYNOS5433_TMU_REG_INTPEND;
> + tmu_intclear = EXYNOS5433_TMU_REG_INTPEND;
> } else {
> tmu_intstat = EXYNOS_TMU_REG_INTSTAT;
> tmu_intclear = EXYNOS_TMU_REG_INTCLEAR;
> @@ -926,6 +1062,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id
> exynos_tmu_match[] = { { .compatible = "samsung,exynos5260-tmu", },
> { .compatible = "samsung,exynos5420-tmu", },
> { .compatible = "samsung,exynos5420-tmu-ext-triminfo", },
> + { .compatible = "samsung,exynos5433-tmu", },
> { .compatible = "samsung,exynos5440-tmu", },
> { .compatible = "samsung,exynos7-tmu", },
> { /* sentinel */ },
> @@ -949,6 +1086,8 @@ static int exynos_of_get_soc_type(struct
> device_node *np) else if (of_device_is_compatible(np,
> "samsung,exynos5420-tmu-ext-triminfo"))
> return SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5420_TRIMINFO;
> + else if (of_device_is_compatible(np,
> "samsung,exynos5433-tmu"))
> + return SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5433;
> else if (of_device_is_compatible(np,
> "samsung,exynos5440-tmu")) return SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5440;
> else if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "samsung,exynos7-tmu"))
> @@ -1069,6 +1208,13 @@ static int exynos_map_dt_data(struct
> platform_device *pdev) data->tmu_set_emulation =
> exynos4412_tmu_set_emulation; data->tmu_clear_irqs =
> exynos4210_tmu_clear_irqs; break;
> + case SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5433:
> + data->tmu_initialize = exynos5433_tmu_initialize;
> + data->tmu_control = exynos7_tmu_control;
I must frankly admit that I'm a bit confused.
I'm curious why we didn't either define totally separate set of
exynos5433_tmu_* functions or reusing existing exynos7_tmu_* ?
Are exynos7 and exynos5433 so much different?
> + data->tmu_read = exynos4412_tmu_read;
> + data->tmu_set_emulation =
> exynos4412_tmu_set_emulation;
> + data->tmu_clear_irqs = exynos4210_tmu_clear_irqs;
> + break;
> case SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5440:
> data->tmu_initialize = exynos5440_tmu_initialize;
> data->tmu_control = exynos5440_tmu_control;
> @@ -1172,7 +1318,9 @@ static int exynos_tmu_probe(struct
> platform_device *pdev) goto err_clk_sec;
> }
>
> - if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS7) {
> + switch (data->soc) {
> + case SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5433:
> + case SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS7:
> data->sclk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "tmu_sclk");
> if (IS_ERR(data->sclk)) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get sclk\n");
> @@ -1184,7 +1332,10 @@ static int exynos_tmu_probe(struct
> platform_device *pdev) goto err_clk;
> }
> }
> - }
> + break;
> + default:
> + break;
> + };
>
> ret = exynos_tmu_initialize(pdev);
> if (ret) {
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.h
> b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.h index 4d71ec6..440c714 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.h
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.h
> @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ enum soc_type {
> SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5260,
> SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5420,
> SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5420_TRIMINFO,
> + SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5433,
> SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5440,
> SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS7,
> };
--
Best regards,
Lukasz Majewski
Samsung R&D Institute Poland (SRPOL) | Linux Platform Group
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists