linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFT v2] x86: move cacheinfo sysfs to generic cacheinfo infrastructure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 04 Mar 2015 11:15:49 +0000
From:	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC:	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
	Andre Przywara <Andre.Przywara@....com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFT v2] x86: move cacheinfo sysfs to generic cacheinfo
 infrastructure

Hi Boris,

On 03/03/15 18:57, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 01:53:02PM -0500, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> We were alternating between the two forms depending on
>> CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK before.  Now we're always sticking to the
>> shorter format.  Please see 513e3d2d11c9 ("cpumask: always use
>> nr_cpu_ids in formatting and parsing functions").
>
> Got it, thanks.
>
> Sudeep, please add Tejun's note to your commit message when resending.
>

I can do that, but wouldn't that add confusion as this commit is not
changing that behaviour. It's already changed in v4.0-rc1

Regards,
Sudeep

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/