[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54F6F98E.2000709@ti.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 17:54:46 +0530
From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
To: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
Axel Lin <axel.lin@...ics.com>
CC: Sylwester Nawrocki <sylvester.nawrocki@...il.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
"linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFT] phy: exynos-mipi-video: Use spin_lock to protct state->regmap
rmw operations
Hi,
On Friday 27 February 2015 06:57 PM, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> On 27/02/15 04:50, Axel Lin wrote:
>> he state->regmap is initialized by devm_regmap_init_mmio().
>> So it's fine to use spin_lock rather than mutex to protct state->regmap rmw
>> operations.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...ics.com>
>> ---
>> Hi Sylwester,
>> I don't have this hardware handy, so can you test if this patch works.
>> This patch is on top of my previous patch (phy: exynos-mipi-video: Fixup
>> the test for state->regmap)
>
> Thanks for the patch, it looks good to me. I somehow missed the syscon
> already uses a spinlock for regmap protection.
>
> v4.0-rc1 seems devastated as far as exynos4 is concerned, it may take
> some time until I get around and fix all the issues so I tested your
> patch on v3.19. It all works well as expected.
>
> Acked-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>
> Tested-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>
This patch doesn't apply on 4.0-rc1. Can to refresh it to mainline
latest?
Cheers
Kishon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists