| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 10:35:47 +0800 From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org> To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>, Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>, "linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq-dt: support cluster level clock On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 08:49:25PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 3 March 2015 at 19:33, Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org> wrote: > > I'm just thinking to finish things in one time. From my previous > > experience, clocks per cluster are common cases for ARM's > > multi-clusters, so i think it's reasonable to add related support. > > Yes they are common, but that will be fixed with new OPP bindings > I am working on [1]. Good to know this and looking forward the patches... > > Regarding of testing this patch, i created two virtual clocks for > > every cluster and passed the test. Do u think this is acceptable? > > Just to confirm again, we aren't going to accept or apply these > patches. It will work without any changes for you, for now. OK, i will go back to just support for the case of one clock source. > -- > viresh > > [1] https://www.marc.info/?l=linaro-kernel&m=142364262800650&w=3 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists