[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150304023547.GB21106@leoy-linaro>
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 10:35:47 +0800
From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq-dt: support cluster level clock
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 08:49:25PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 3 March 2015 at 19:33, Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org> wrote:
> > I'm just thinking to finish things in one time. From my previous
> > experience, clocks per cluster are common cases for ARM's
> > multi-clusters, so i think it's reasonable to add related support.
>
> Yes they are common, but that will be fixed with new OPP bindings
> I am working on [1].
Good to know this and looking forward the patches...
> > Regarding of testing this patch, i created two virtual clocks for
> > every cluster and passed the test. Do u think this is acceptable?
>
> Just to confirm again, we aren't going to accept or apply these
> patches. It will work without any changes for you, for now.
OK, i will go back to just support for the case of one clock source.
> --
> viresh
>
> [1] https://www.marc.info/?l=linaro-kernel&m=142364262800650&w=3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists