linux-kernel - Re: [ASoC]fsl_ssi: fix of_property_read_u32

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <54F70389.6020004@maciej.szmigiero.name>
Date:	Wed, 04 Mar 2015 14:07:21 +0100
From:	"Maciej S. Szmigiero" <mail@...iej.szmigiero.name>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC:	alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Timur Tabi <timur@...i.org>,
	Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>,
	Xiubo Li <Li.Xiubo@...escale.com>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [ASoC]fsl_ssi: fix of_property_read_u32_array return value check

W dniu 24.02.2015 09:24, Mark Brown pisze:
> On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 11:11:43PM +0100, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
>> of_property_read_u32_array returns 0 on success, so the return value shouldn't be inverted twice,
>> first on assignment then in condition expression.
> 
> This doesn't apply to current code, please check and resend.  Please
> also keep your changelog under 80 columns as covered in
> SubmittingPatches.
> 

Thanks for looking into it,

Against which tree/branch patches for ASoC should be generated?

Best regards,
Maciej Szmigiero

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/