[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1425479350.25940.177.camel@citrix.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 14:29:10 +0000
From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>
To: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
CC: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>, <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
<boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>, <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <cyliu@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/4] usb: Introduce Xen pvUSB backend
On Wed, 2015-03-04 at 14:19 +0000, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 04/03/15 14:09, Juergen Gross wrote:
> >
> > The main question whether it is worth to consider this alternative is
> > the performance aspect. Does anyone have an idea which USB devices would
> > typically be used via pvusb? I'd suspect memory sticks and USB disks
> > and perhaps webcams being the most performance relevant ones. Is an
> > additional copy operation of user data acceptable here?
>
> I have no idea. We (XenServer) have no use cases at all for USB device
> passthrough.
My gut feeling is that for USB 1 and 2 the bus itself isn't fast enough
that anyone would care. qdisk has acceptable for disks, so it's probably
ok for usb too.
For usb 3 onwards, well, maybe when we care about those we'll decide
that a kernel space driver is needed, but for now it seems like
userspace would be ok.
Ian.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists