[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54F81C9A.6040502@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2015 17:06:34 +0800
From: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
CC: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@....com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"Graeme Gregory" <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>,
Sudeep Holla <Sudeep.Holla@....com>,
"Jon Masters" <jcm@...hat.com>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>,
Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>,
Ashwin Chaugule <ashwinc@...eaurora.org>,
<suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>, <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org>,
Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@...aro.org>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 16/21] irqchip: Add GICv2 specific ACPI boot support
On 2015/3/5 6:50, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, February 25, 2015 04:39:56 PM Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> From: Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@...aro.org>
>>
>> ACPI kernel uses MADT table for proper GIC initialization. It needs to
>> parse GIC related subtables, collect CPU interface and distributor
>> addresses and call driver initialization function (which is hardware
>> abstraction agnostic). In a similar way, FDT initialize GICv1/2.
>>
>> NOTE: This commit allow to initialize GICv1/2 basic functionality.
>> While now simple GICv2 init call is used, any further GIC features
>> require generic infrastructure for proper ACPI irqchip initialization.
>> That mechanism and stacked irqdomains to support GICv2 MSI/virtualization
>> extension, GICv3/4 and its ITS are considered as next steps.
[...]
>> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irqchip.c b/drivers/irqchip/irqchip.c
>> index 0fe2f71..5855240 100644
>> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irqchip.c
>> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irqchip.c
>> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
>> * warranty of any kind, whether express or implied.
>> */
>>
>> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
>> #include <linux/init.h>
>> #include <linux/of_irq.h>
>> #include <linux/irqchip.h>
>> @@ -26,4 +27,6 @@ extern struct of_device_id __irqchip_of_table[];
>> void __init irqchip_init(void)
>> {
>> of_irq_init(__irqchip_of_table);
>> +
>> + acpi_irq_init();
>> }
>> diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
>> index c03d8d1..e27117a 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/acpi.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
>> @@ -557,6 +557,20 @@ static inline int acpi_device_modalias(struct device *dev,
>>
>> #endif /* !CONFIG_ACPI */
>>
>> +#if defined(CONFIG_ACPI) && defined(CONFIG_ARM64)
>> +static inline void acpi_irq_init(void)
>> +{
>> + /*
>> + * Hardcode ACPI IRQ chip initialization to GICv2 for now.
>> + * Proper irqchip infrastructure will be implemented along with
>> + * incoming GICv2m|GICv3|ITS bits.
>> + */
>> + acpi_gic_init();
>> +}
>> +#else
>> +static inline void acpi_irq_init(void) { }
>> +#endif
> I don't want this in a common header.
This is because of irqchip_init(void) in drivers/irqchip/irqchip.c
will be called by PowerPC too, so we need to put it in a common
head file, I will discuss with Tomasz to see if we have any further
solution.
Thanks
Hanjun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists