linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/5] UBI: Coverity-inspired fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <54F830EA.4080106@nod.at>
Date:	Thu, 05 Mar 2015 11:33:14 +0100
From:	Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To:	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
	Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
CC:	linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] UBI: Coverity-inspired fixes

Brian,

Am 28.02.2015 um 11:23 schrieb Brian Norris:
> Except for the last one, these were inspired by Coverity Scan results.
> 
> These fixes have barely been tested, but they are pretty straightforward
> logically. As they've been sitting in my dust pile too long, I thought I'd at
> least get them out there.
> 
> Brian Norris (5):
>   UBI: account for bitflips in both the VID header and data
>   UBI: fix out of bounds write
>   UBI: initialize LEB number variable
>   UBI: fix check for "too many bytes"
>   UBI: align comment for readability

Nice work!
I'll test them later today.
Just a quick question, no patch has a stable tag, is this by design?
>From a first look most of them look like stable material.

Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/