lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 05 Mar 2015 10:59:14 +0000
From:	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>
To:	Arun Ramamurthy <arun.ramamurthy@...adcom.com>
Cc:	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
	Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...gle.com>,
	Anatol Pomazau <anatol@...gle.com>,
	Jonathan Richardson <jonathar@...adcom.com>,
	Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
	Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
	"bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com" 
	<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] video: ARM CLCD: Added dt support to set tim2 register

On Wed, 2015-03-04 at 00:37 +0000, Arun Ramamurthy wrote:
> > That way you're precisely describing the way the hardware is wired up.
> > And the driver simply tries to get clcdclk first, if it's defined -
> > cool, set clksel to 1, if not - try hclk and set clksel to 0. If neither
> > of them is present - bail out.
> >
> > Does this make any sense?
> >
> This makes sense to me, thank you for the suggestions. I will fix it all 
> up in V2

Cool. Just a word of comment to my own words ;-) The "bail out" case was
a bad idea - the non-DT use cases more likely than not will have no
clock name defined. So, to maintain backward compatibility, the driver
will still have to work when no named clock is available. I think the
simplest way to do that is to check if "hclk" is available, and use it
if it is (setting the clksel accordingly). Otherwise - proceed as it was
the case previously.

Pawel

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ