lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54F86623.5070605@arm.com>
Date:	Thu, 05 Mar 2015 14:20:19 +0000
From:	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
To:	Eric Auger <eric.auger@...aro.org>,
	"eric.auger@...com" <eric.auger@...com>,
	"christoffer.dall@...aro.org" <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu" <kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu>,
	"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
CC:	Andre Przywara <Andre.Przywara@....com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"patches@...aro.org" <patches@...aro.org>,
	"gleb@...nel.org" <gleb@...nel.org>,
	"pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 5/5] KVM: arm/arm64: add irqfd support

On 05/03/15 14:04, Eric Auger wrote:
> Hi Marc,
> On 03/05/2015 11:53 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On 04/03/15 10:14, Eric Auger wrote:
>>> This patch enables irqfd on arm/arm64.
>>>
>>> Both irqfd and resamplefd are supported. Injection is implemented
>>> in vgic.c without routing.
>>>
>>> This patch enables CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_EVENTFD and CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQFD.
>>>
>>> KVM_CAP_IRQFD is now advertised. KVM_CAP_IRQFD_RESAMPLE capability
>>> automatically is advertised as soon as CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQFD is set.
>>>
>>> Irqfd injection is restricted to SPI. The rationale behind not
>>> supporting PPI irqfd injection is that any device using a PPI would
>>> be a private-to-the-CPU device (timer for instance), so its state
>>> would have to be context-switched along with the VCPU and would
>>> require in-kernel wiring anyhow. It is not a relevant use case for
>>> irqfds.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@...aro.org>
>>> Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>
>>>
>>> ---
>>> v8 -> v9:
>>> - replace kvm_debug by trace_kvm_set_irq and add
>>>   BUG_ON(!vgic_initialized(kvm));
>>>
>>> v7 -> v8:
>>> - remove kvm_irq_has_notifier call
>>> - part of dist locking changes now are part of previous patch file
>>> - remove gic_initialized() check in kvm_set_irq
>>> - remove Christoffer's Reviewed-by after this change
>>>
>>> v5 -> v6:
>>> - KVM_CAP_IRQFD support depends on vgic_present
>>> - add Christoffer's Reviewed-by
>>>
>>> v4 -> v5:
>>> - squash [PATCH v4 3/3] KVM: arm64: add irqfd support into this patch
>>> - some rewording in Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt and in vgic
>>>   vgic_process_maintenance unlock comment.
>>> - move explanation of why not supporting PPI into commit message
>>> - in case of injection before gic readiness, -ENODEV is returned. It is
>>>   up to the user space to avoid this situation.
>>>
>>> v3 -> v4:
>>> - reword commit message
>>> - explain why we unlock the distributor before calling kvm_notify_acked_irq
>>> - rename is_assigned_irq into has_notifier
>>> - change EOI and injection kvm_debug format string
>>> - remove error local variable in kvm_set_irq
>>> - Move HAVE_KVM_IRQCHIP unset in a separate patch
>>> - handle case were the irqfd injection is attempted before the vgic is ready.
>>>   in such a case the notifier, if any, is called immediatly
>>> - use nr_irqs to test spi is within correct range
>>>
>>> v2 -> v3:
>>> - removal of irq.h from eventfd.c put in a separate patch to increase
>>>   visibility
>>> - properly expose KVM_CAP_IRQFD capability in arm.c
>>> - remove CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQCHIP meaningfull only if irq_comm.c is used
>>>
>>> v1 -> v2:
>>> - rebase on 3.17rc1
>>> - move of the dist unlock in process_maintenance
>>> - remove of dist lock in __kvm_vgic_sync_hwstate
>>> - rewording of the commit message (add resamplefd reference)
>>> - remove irq.h
>>>
>>> Conflicts:
>>>      arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig
>>> ---
>>>  Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt |  6 ++++-
>>>  arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h   |  3 +++
>>>  arch/arm/kvm/Kconfig              |  2 ++
>>>  arch/arm/kvm/Makefile             |  2 +-
>>>  arch/arm/kvm/arm.c                |  5 ++++
>>>  arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h |  3 +++
>>>  arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig            |  2 ++
>>>  arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile           |  2 +-
>>>  virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c               | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>  9 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
>>> index b112efc..b265d8e 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
>>> +++ b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
>>> @@ -2234,7 +2234,7 @@ into the hash PTE second double word).
>>>  4.75 KVM_IRQFD
>>>
>>>  Capability: KVM_CAP_IRQFD
>>> -Architectures: x86 s390
>>> +Architectures: x86 s390 arm arm64
>>>  Type: vm ioctl
>>>  Parameters: struct kvm_irqfd (in)
>>>  Returns: 0 on success, -1 on error
>>> @@ -2260,6 +2260,10 @@ Note that closing the resamplefd is not sufficient to disable the
>>>  irqfd.  The KVM_IRQFD_FLAG_RESAMPLE is only necessary on assignment
>>>  and need not be specified with KVM_IRQFD_FLAG_DEASSIGN.
>>>
>>> +On ARM/ARM64, the gsi field in the kvm_irqfd struct specifies the Shared
>>> +Peripheral Interrupt (SPI) index, such that the GIC interrupt ID is
>>> +given by gsi + 32.
>>> +
>>>  4.76 KVM_PPC_ALLOCATE_HTAB
>>>
>>>  Capability: KVM_CAP_PPC_ALLOC_HTAB
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>>> index 0db25bc..2499867 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>>> @@ -198,6 +198,9 @@ struct kvm_arch_memory_slot {
>>>  /* Highest supported SPI, from VGIC_NR_IRQS */
>>>  #define KVM_ARM_IRQ_GIC_MAX         127
>>>
>>> +/* One single KVM irqchip, ie. the VGIC */
>>> +#define KVM_NR_IRQCHIPS          1
>>> +
>>>  /* PSCI interface */
>>>  #define KVM_PSCI_FN_BASE            0x95c1ba5e
>>>  #define KVM_PSCI_FN(n)                      (KVM_PSCI_FN_BASE + (n))
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/kvm/Kconfig
>>> index aae5242..d735a3e 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/Kconfig
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/Kconfig
>>> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ config KVM
>>>      select KVM_GENERIC_DIRTYLOG_READ_PROTECT
>>>      select SRCU
>>>      depends on ARM_VIRT_EXT && ARM_LPAE
>>> +    select HAVE_KVM_EVENTFD
>>>      ---help---
>>>        Support hosting virtualized guest machines. You will also
>>>        need to select one or more of the processor modules below.
>>> @@ -58,6 +59,7 @@ config KVM_ARM_MAX_VCPUS
>>>  config KVM_ARM_VGIC
>>>      bool "KVM support for Virtual GIC"
>>>      depends on KVM_ARM_HOST && OF
>>> +    select HAVE_KVM_IRQFD
>>>      default y
>>>      ---help---
>>>        Adds support for a hardware assisted, in-kernel GIC emulation.
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/Makefile b/arch/arm/kvm/Makefile
>>> index 443b8be..539c1a5 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/Makefile
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/Makefile
>>> @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ AFLAGS_init.o := -Wa,-march=armv7-a$(plus_virt)
>>>  AFLAGS_interrupts.o := -Wa,-march=armv7-a$(plus_virt)
>>>
>>>  KVM := ../../../virt/kvm
>>> -kvm-arm-y = $(KVM)/kvm_main.o $(KVM)/coalesced_mmio.o
>>> +kvm-arm-y = $(KVM)/kvm_main.o $(KVM)/coalesced_mmio.o $(KVM)/eventfd.o
>>>
>>>  obj-y += kvm-arm.o init.o interrupts.o
>>>  obj-y += arm.o handle_exit.o guest.o mmu.o emulate.o reset.o
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
>>> index 5300d5a..4313776 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
>>> @@ -175,6 +175,11 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext)
>>>      case KVM_CAP_IRQCHIP:
>>>              r = vgic_present;
>>>              break;
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQFD
>>> +    case KVM_CAP_IRQFD:
>>> +            r = vgic_present;
>>> +            break;
>>> +#endif
>>
>> Nitpick: we have "select HAVE_KVM_IRQFD", so we can lose the #ifdef-ery.
> right. Also I think the vgic_present can be removed since
> CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQFD always is set when CONFIG_KVM_ARM_VGIC is set.
> So overall this indeed can simply be replaced by Paolo's patch.
>>
>>>      case KVM_CAP_DEVICE_CTRL:
>>>      case KVM_CAP_USER_MEMORY:
>>>      case KVM_CAP_SYNC_MMU:
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>>> index 3ef77a4..c154c0b 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>>> @@ -191,6 +191,9 @@ struct kvm_arch_memory_slot {
>>>  /* Highest supported SPI, from VGIC_NR_IRQS */
>>>  #define KVM_ARM_IRQ_GIC_MAX         127
>>>
>>> +/* One single KVM irqchip, ie. the VGIC */
>>> +#define KVM_NR_IRQCHIPS          1
>>> +
>>>  /* PSCI interface */
>>>  #define KVM_PSCI_FN_BASE            0x95c1ba5e
>>>  #define KVM_PSCI_FN(n)                      (KVM_PSCI_FN_BASE + (n))
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig
>>> index 039d8cf..143c9fd 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig
>>> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ config KVM
>>>      select KVM_ARM_TIMER
>>>      select KVM_GENERIC_DIRTYLOG_READ_PROTECT
>>>      select SRCU
>>> +    select HAVE_KVM_EVENTFD
>>>      ---help---
>>>        Support hosting virtualized guest machines.
>>>
>>> @@ -53,6 +54,7 @@ config KVM_ARM_MAX_VCPUS
>>>  config KVM_ARM_VGIC
>>>      bool
>>>      depends on KVM_ARM_HOST && OF
>>> +    select HAVE_KVM_IRQFD
>>
>> Hmmm. There is way too many selects here. Can't we just select it with
>> CONFIG_KVM_ARM_VGIC, and be done with it?
> 
> I did that way since CONFIG_KVM_ARM_VGIC is not selected in the config
> KVM section on 32b. Currently the IRQFD select location is same for arm
> and arm64.
> 
> do you prefer I select HAVE_KVM_IRQFD in the config KVM section, ie. at
> the same place we select CONFIG_KVM_ARM_VGIC?

We cannot have irqfd without vgic, can we? Or am I misunderstanding the
dependency chain entirely?

[...]

> Do I need to post a v10 based on Paolo's patch?

I don't think so, we can probably fixup things when we merge things.
Let's sort the above first, and we should be good.

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ