[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54F8696D.9010600@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 14:34:21 +0000
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
To: Eric Auger <eric.auger@...aro.org>,
"eric.auger@...com" <eric.auger@...com>,
"christoffer.dall@...aro.org" <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu" <kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Andre Przywara <Andre.Przywara@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"patches@...aro.org" <patches@...aro.org>,
"gleb@...nel.org" <gleb@...nel.org>,
"pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 5/5] KVM: arm/arm64: add irqfd support
On 05/03/15 14:26, Eric Auger wrote:
> On 03/05/2015 03:20 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On 05/03/15 14:04, Eric Auger wrote:
>>> Hi Marc,
>>> On 03/05/2015 11:53 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>>> On 04/03/15 10:14, Eric Auger wrote:
>>>>> This patch enables irqfd on arm/arm64.
>>>>>
>>>>> Both irqfd and resamplefd are supported. Injection is implemented
>>>>> in vgic.c without routing.
>>>>>
>>>>> This patch enables CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_EVENTFD and CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQFD.
>>>>>
>>>>> KVM_CAP_IRQFD is now advertised. KVM_CAP_IRQFD_RESAMPLE capability
>>>>> automatically is advertised as soon as CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQFD is set.
>>>>>
>>>>> Irqfd injection is restricted to SPI. The rationale behind not
>>>>> supporting PPI irqfd injection is that any device using a PPI would
>>>>> be a private-to-the-CPU device (timer for instance), so its state
>>>>> would have to be context-switched along with the VCPU and would
>>>>> require in-kernel wiring anyhow. It is not a relevant use case for
>>>>> irqfds.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@...aro.org>
>>>>> Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> v8 -> v9:
>>>>> - replace kvm_debug by trace_kvm_set_irq and add
>>>>> BUG_ON(!vgic_initialized(kvm));
>>>>>
>>>>> v7 -> v8:
>>>>> - remove kvm_irq_has_notifier call
>>>>> - part of dist locking changes now are part of previous patch file
>>>>> - remove gic_initialized() check in kvm_set_irq
>>>>> - remove Christoffer's Reviewed-by after this change
>>>>>
>>>>> v5 -> v6:
>>>>> - KVM_CAP_IRQFD support depends on vgic_present
>>>>> - add Christoffer's Reviewed-by
>>>>>
>>>>> v4 -> v5:
>>>>> - squash [PATCH v4 3/3] KVM: arm64: add irqfd support into this patch
>>>>> - some rewording in Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt and in vgic
>>>>> vgic_process_maintenance unlock comment.
>>>>> - move explanation of why not supporting PPI into commit message
>>>>> - in case of injection before gic readiness, -ENODEV is returned. It is
>>>>> up to the user space to avoid this situation.
>>>>>
>>>>> v3 -> v4:
>>>>> - reword commit message
>>>>> - explain why we unlock the distributor before calling kvm_notify_acked_irq
>>>>> - rename is_assigned_irq into has_notifier
>>>>> - change EOI and injection kvm_debug format string
>>>>> - remove error local variable in kvm_set_irq
>>>>> - Move HAVE_KVM_IRQCHIP unset in a separate patch
>>>>> - handle case were the irqfd injection is attempted before the vgic is ready.
>>>>> in such a case the notifier, if any, is called immediatly
>>>>> - use nr_irqs to test spi is within correct range
>>>>>
>>>>> v2 -> v3:
>>>>> - removal of irq.h from eventfd.c put in a separate patch to increase
>>>>> visibility
>>>>> - properly expose KVM_CAP_IRQFD capability in arm.c
>>>>> - remove CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQCHIP meaningfull only if irq_comm.c is used
>>>>>
>>>>> v1 -> v2:
>>>>> - rebase on 3.17rc1
>>>>> - move of the dist unlock in process_maintenance
>>>>> - remove of dist lock in __kvm_vgic_sync_hwstate
>>>>> - rewording of the commit message (add resamplefd reference)
>>>>> - remove irq.h
>>>>>
>>>>> Conflicts:
>>>>> arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig
>>>>> ---
>>>>> Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt | 6 ++++-
>>>>> arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 3 +++
>>>>> arch/arm/kvm/Kconfig | 2 ++
>>>>> arch/arm/kvm/Makefile | 2 +-
>>>>> arch/arm/kvm/arm.c | 5 ++++
>>>>> arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 3 +++
>>>>> arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig | 2 ++
>>>>> arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile | 2 +-
>>>>> virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>> 9 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
>>>>> index b112efc..b265d8e 100644
>>>>> --- a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
>>>>> @@ -2234,7 +2234,7 @@ into the hash PTE second double word).
>>>>> 4.75 KVM_IRQFD
>>>>>
>>>>> Capability: KVM_CAP_IRQFD
>>>>> -Architectures: x86 s390
>>>>> +Architectures: x86 s390 arm arm64
>>>>> Type: vm ioctl
>>>>> Parameters: struct kvm_irqfd (in)
>>>>> Returns: 0 on success, -1 on error
>>>>> @@ -2260,6 +2260,10 @@ Note that closing the resamplefd is not sufficient to disable the
>>>>> irqfd. The KVM_IRQFD_FLAG_RESAMPLE is only necessary on assignment
>>>>> and need not be specified with KVM_IRQFD_FLAG_DEASSIGN.
>>>>>
>>>>> +On ARM/ARM64, the gsi field in the kvm_irqfd struct specifies the Shared
>>>>> +Peripheral Interrupt (SPI) index, such that the GIC interrupt ID is
>>>>> +given by gsi + 32.
>>>>> +
>>>>> 4.76 KVM_PPC_ALLOCATE_HTAB
>>>>>
>>>>> Capability: KVM_CAP_PPC_ALLOC_HTAB
>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>>>>> index 0db25bc..2499867 100644
>>>>> --- a/arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>>>>> @@ -198,6 +198,9 @@ struct kvm_arch_memory_slot {
>>>>> /* Highest supported SPI, from VGIC_NR_IRQS */
>>>>> #define KVM_ARM_IRQ_GIC_MAX 127
>>>>>
>>>>> +/* One single KVM irqchip, ie. the VGIC */
>>>>> +#define KVM_NR_IRQCHIPS 1
>>>>> +
>>>>> /* PSCI interface */
>>>>> #define KVM_PSCI_FN_BASE 0x95c1ba5e
>>>>> #define KVM_PSCI_FN(n) (KVM_PSCI_FN_BASE + (n))
>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/kvm/Kconfig
>>>>> index aae5242..d735a3e 100644
>>>>> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/Kconfig
>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/Kconfig
>>>>> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ config KVM
>>>>> select KVM_GENERIC_DIRTYLOG_READ_PROTECT
>>>>> select SRCU
>>>>> depends on ARM_VIRT_EXT && ARM_LPAE
>>>>> + select HAVE_KVM_EVENTFD
>>>>> ---help---
>>>>> Support hosting virtualized guest machines. You will also
>>>>> need to select one or more of the processor modules below.
>>>>> @@ -58,6 +59,7 @@ config KVM_ARM_MAX_VCPUS
>>>>> config KVM_ARM_VGIC
>>>>> bool "KVM support for Virtual GIC"
>>>>> depends on KVM_ARM_HOST && OF
>>>>> + select HAVE_KVM_IRQFD
>>>>> default y
>>>>> ---help---
>>>>> Adds support for a hardware assisted, in-kernel GIC emulation.
>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/Makefile b/arch/arm/kvm/Makefile
>>>>> index 443b8be..539c1a5 100644
>>>>> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/Makefile
>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/Makefile
>>>>> @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ AFLAGS_init.o := -Wa,-march=armv7-a$(plus_virt)
>>>>> AFLAGS_interrupts.o := -Wa,-march=armv7-a$(plus_virt)
>>>>>
>>>>> KVM := ../../../virt/kvm
>>>>> -kvm-arm-y = $(KVM)/kvm_main.o $(KVM)/coalesced_mmio.o
>>>>> +kvm-arm-y = $(KVM)/kvm_main.o $(KVM)/coalesced_mmio.o $(KVM)/eventfd.o
>>>>>
>>>>> obj-y += kvm-arm.o init.o interrupts.o
>>>>> obj-y += arm.o handle_exit.o guest.o mmu.o emulate.o reset.o
>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
>>>>> index 5300d5a..4313776 100644
>>>>> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
>>>>> @@ -175,6 +175,11 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext)
>>>>> case KVM_CAP_IRQCHIP:
>>>>> r = vgic_present;
>>>>> break;
>>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQFD
>>>>> + case KVM_CAP_IRQFD:
>>>>> + r = vgic_present;
>>>>> + break;
>>>>> +#endif
>>>>
>>>> Nitpick: we have "select HAVE_KVM_IRQFD", so we can lose the #ifdef-ery.
>>> right. Also I think the vgic_present can be removed since
>>> CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQFD always is set when CONFIG_KVM_ARM_VGIC is set.
>>> So overall this indeed can simply be replaced by Paolo's patch.
>>>>
>>>>> case KVM_CAP_DEVICE_CTRL:
>>>>> case KVM_CAP_USER_MEMORY:
>>>>> case KVM_CAP_SYNC_MMU:
>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>>>>> index 3ef77a4..c154c0b 100644
>>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>>>>> @@ -191,6 +191,9 @@ struct kvm_arch_memory_slot {
>>>>> /* Highest supported SPI, from VGIC_NR_IRQS */
>>>>> #define KVM_ARM_IRQ_GIC_MAX 127
>>>>>
>>>>> +/* One single KVM irqchip, ie. the VGIC */
>>>>> +#define KVM_NR_IRQCHIPS 1
>>>>> +
>>>>> /* PSCI interface */
>>>>> #define KVM_PSCI_FN_BASE 0x95c1ba5e
>>>>> #define KVM_PSCI_FN(n) (KVM_PSCI_FN_BASE + (n))
>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig
>>>>> index 039d8cf..143c9fd 100644
>>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig
>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig
>>>>> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ config KVM
>>>>> select KVM_ARM_TIMER
>>>>> select KVM_GENERIC_DIRTYLOG_READ_PROTECT
>>>>> select SRCU
>>>>> + select HAVE_KVM_EVENTFD
>>>>> ---help---
>>>>> Support hosting virtualized guest machines.
>>>>>
>>>>> @@ -53,6 +54,7 @@ config KVM_ARM_MAX_VCPUS
>>>>> config KVM_ARM_VGIC
>>>>> bool
>>>>> depends on KVM_ARM_HOST && OF
>>>>> + select HAVE_KVM_IRQFD
>>>>
>>>> Hmmm. There is way too many selects here. Can't we just select it with
>>>> CONFIG_KVM_ARM_VGIC, and be done with it?
>>>
>>> I did that way since CONFIG_KVM_ARM_VGIC is not selected in the config
>>> KVM section on 32b. Currently the IRQFD select location is same for arm
>>> and arm64.
>>>
>>> do you prefer I select HAVE_KVM_IRQFD in the config KVM section, ie. at
>>> the same place we select CONFIG_KVM_ARM_VGIC?
>>
>> We cannot have irqfd without vgic, can we? Or am I misunderstanding the
>> dependency chain entirely?
>
> No we can't have irqfd without vgic.
Blah. Ignore me. The additional select is for eventfd, not irqfd. Your
patch is just fine...
Sorry about the noise.
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists