[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFRkauD6gXfuaGoopF-B+e1KLEi64XdWprus7nA6wx8nhki6zA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2015 23:29:13 +0800
From: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...ics.com>
To: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>
Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
Vignesh R <vigneshr@...com>, Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] phy: omap-control: Remove unneeded ifdef CONFIG_OF
guard and of_match_ptr
2015-03-05 18:48 GMT+08:00 Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>:
> Hi Alex,
It's Axel.
>
> Since we're anyways going to fail probe for !CONFIG_OF, why do you want to
> add the unnecessary device table to the kernel?
>
> what are you benefiting from this change?
If the driver works for both dt case and non-dt case, using the ifdef CONFIG_OF
guard can save a few memory for non-dt case.
For dt-only driver it is not required because you cannot use the driver
if !CONFIG_OF. Which means you should not build this driver at all if !CONFIG_OF
unless you just want to do compile test.
Regards,
Axel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists