lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 5 Mar 2015 09:39:35 -0800
From:	Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
To:	Charles Mooney <charliemooney@...gle.com>
Cc:	Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...omium.org>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware_class: Add firmware filename overrides

Hi Charles,

> Specifically this was motivated by a situation where we have one
> device with a dual-sourced touchscreen. Both use the same driver but
> have different hardware & fw. Our FW updating software therefore,
> needs to be able to update with the correct FW and detect all this at
> runtime due to a read-only partition (so moving the firmware binaries
> around isn't really an option)
> Here the device has only one touchscreen at a time, but it isn't known
> until run-time which will be present.
> 
> So in this case the driver is serving the same function in each
> situation (running a touchscreen) but may be working with different
> hardware.
> 
> Another situation where I've personally wanted this functionality is
> on a device that uses the same touch driver for both a touchscreen and
> a touchpad on the same device. If the driver only grabs a copy of FW
> from, say, /lib/firmware/touch_fw.bin then you either need to move the
> firmware binaries around on disk to update either device, or have a
> change like this that allows you to override which filename it loads.
> The moving option is not viable if you're using a RO filesystem.

what is the actual problem here? We have drivers that load multiple firmware files and we have drivers that pick a different firmware depending on some parameters it reads from the device.

Seems this is all possible already at the moment with the existing framework. You just need to update the drivers to operate properly.

Regards

Marcel

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ