[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHse=S8=2TZQVni3ervR1ai7gd0K6RFTU6D67CfLrpxn-h1-Vg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2015 18:32:00 +0000
From: David Drysdale <drysdale@...gle.com>
To: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>, Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-audit@...hat.com
Subject: x32 + audit status?
Hi,
Do we currently expect the audit system to work with x32 syscalls?
I was playing with the audit system for the first time today (on
v4.0-rc2, due to [1]), and it didn't seem to work for me. (Tweaking
ptrace.c like the patch below seemed to help, but I may just have
configured something wrong.)
I know there was a bunch of activity around this area in mid-2014,
but I'm not sure what the final position was...
Thanks,
David
[1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/3/4/879
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c
index e510618b2e91..443932afd9e8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -1445,7 +1445,7 @@ static void do_audit_syscall_entry(struct
pt_regs *regs, u32 arch)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
if (arch == AUDIT_ARCH_X86_64) {
- audit_syscall_entry(regs->orig_ax, regs->di,
+ audit_syscall_entry(regs->orig_ax & __SYSCALL_MASK, regs->di,
regs->si, regs->dx, regs->r10);
} else
#endif
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists