[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1503051508130.790@gentwo.org>
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2015 15:09:42 -0600 (CST)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
cc: Eric B Munson <emunson@...mai.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Roland Dreier <roland@...nel.org>,
Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@...el.com>,
Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock@...il.com>,
Mike Marciniszyn <infinipath@...el.com>
Subject: Re: Resurrecting the VM_PINNED discussion
On Thu, 5 Mar 2015, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Am I missing something about why it was never merged?
>
> Because I got lost in IB code and didn't manage to bribe anyone into
> fixing that for me.
Well the complexity increased since then with the on demand pinning,
mmu notifiers etc etc ...
I thought the clear distinction between pinning and mlocking would do the
trick?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists