[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150305221930.GC22336@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2015 17:19:30 -0500
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
To: HATAYAMA Daisuke <d.hatayama@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: ebiederm@...ssion.com, masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
bhe@...hat.com, hidehiro.kawai.ez@...achi.com
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] kernel/panic/kexec: fix
"crash_kexec_post_notifiers" option issue in oops path
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 05:56:48PM +0900, HATAYAMA Daisuke wrote:
> The commit f06e5153f4ae2e2f3b0300f0e260e40cb7fefd45 introduced
> "crash_kexec_post_notifiers" kernel boot option, which toggles
> wheather panic() calls crash_kexec() before or after panic_notifiers
> and dump kmsg.
>
> The problem is that the commit overlooks panic_on_oops kernel boot
> option. If it is enabled, crash_kexec() is called directly without
> going through panic() in oops path.
>
> To fix this issue, this patch adds a check to
> "crash_kexec_post_notifiers" in the condition of kexec_should_crash().
>
> Signed-off-by: HATAYAMA Daisuke <d.hatayama@...fujitsu.com>
> Acked-by: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
> Tested-by: Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@...achi.com>
> ---
> include/linux/kernel.h | 3 +++
> kernel/kexec.c | 2 ++
> kernel/panic.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/kernel.h b/include/linux/kernel.h
> index 64ce58b..f47379f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kernel.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kernel.h
> @@ -426,6 +426,9 @@ extern int panic_on_unrecovered_nmi;
> extern int panic_on_io_nmi;
> extern int panic_on_warn;
> extern int sysctl_panic_on_stackoverflow;
> +
> +extern bool crash_kexec_post_notifiers;
> +
> /*
> * Only to be used by arch init code. If the user over-wrote the default
> * CONFIG_PANIC_TIMEOUT, honor it.
> diff --git a/kernel/kexec.c b/kernel/kexec.c
> index 9a8a01a..0ecf252 100644
> --- a/kernel/kexec.c
> +++ b/kernel/kexec.c
> @@ -84,6 +84,8 @@ struct resource crashk_low_res = {
>
> int kexec_should_crash(struct task_struct *p)
> {
> + if (crash_kexec_post_notifiers)
> + return 0;
This is little confusing. So if crash_kexec_post_notifiers is set but
panic_on_oops is not set, still we will return?
Should we do this only if panic_on_oops is set? IOW, how about following
if (panic_on_oops && crash_kexec_post_notifiers)
return 0;
And then also put a comment explaining the rationale.
Thanks
Vivek
> if (in_interrupt() || !p->pid || is_global_init(p) || panic_on_oops)
> return 1;
> return 0;
> diff --git a/kernel/panic.c b/kernel/panic.c
> index 4d8d6f9..6582546 100644
> --- a/kernel/panic.c
> +++ b/kernel/panic.c
> @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ static unsigned long tainted_mask;
> static int pause_on_oops;
> static int pause_on_oops_flag;
> static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(pause_on_oops_lock);
> -static bool crash_kexec_post_notifiers;
> +bool crash_kexec_post_notifiers;
> int panic_on_warn __read_mostly;
>
> int panic_timeout = CONFIG_PANIC_TIMEOUT;
> --
> 1.9.3
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists