[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87egp384m0.fsf@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 23:24:39 +0100
From: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Peter Zijlstra \(Intel\)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] lib/vsprintf.c: Even faster decimal conversion
On Thu, Mar 05 2015, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 08:03:33AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
>> On Thu, 2015-03-05 at 16:22 +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
>>
>> > I'm assuming the underwhelming response means NAK.
>>
>> Dunno why you assume that, sometimes it just takes
>> awhile for people to look at non-critical, infrequent
>> optimization changes like this.
Well, when nobody has responded within a week with even a "not obviously
insane, I'll look at it after -rcN/next full moon/...", there's usually
little hope of ever getting some feedback.
>> Seems sensible enough to me though.
>
> I'd like to see how this actually affects larger operations - sth
> along the line of top consumes D% less CPU cycles w/ N processes - if
> for nothing else, just to get the sense of scale,
That makes sense. I'll see if I can get some reproducible numbers, but
I'm afraid the effect drowns in all the syscall overhead. Which would be
a valid argument against touching the code.
> I haven't studied the code but looks sensible enough on a glance, so,
> FWIW,
>
> Looks-sensible-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Thanks, this was the kind of feedback I was hoping for.
Rasmus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists