[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrVX6SVOdH7W_eU_f=ueNHRSMa8ZcVFqF85zpuegpBqhQg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2015 15:06:38 -0800
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Boaz Harrosh <boaz@...xistor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Roger C. Pao" <rcpao.enmotus@...il.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@...1.01.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3 v5] e820: Fix handling of NvDIMM chips
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 2:48 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> Seriously, if type 12 is the de facto standard for NvDIMMs, I think we
> should add it. The documented ACPI method of using flags was doomed
> from the start.
I think it's a de facto standard that type 12 means "nvdimm". I don't
think there's any kind of standard as to whether that means that it's
permissible to touch that memory or that nvdimm means type 12.
I have no problem w/ the resource name saying "nvdimm", but I do
object to autoloading anything as a result.
(There is no type 12 on EFI, nor will there ever be, since there is no
e820 at all on EFI.)
--Andy
>
> -hpa
>
--
Andy Lutomirski
AMA Capital Management, LLC
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists