lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54F96F5B.2090601@huawei.com>
Date:	Fri, 6 Mar 2015 17:11:55 +0800
From:	Zhang Zhen <zhenzhang.zhang@...wei.com>
To:	<linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:	<tim.kryger@...aro.org>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	<jamie@...ieiles.com>, <alan@...ux.intel.com>, <arnd@...db.de>,
	<shenjiangjiang@...wei.com>, <long.wanglong@...wei.com>
Subject: [RFC] With 8250 Designware UART, if writes to the LCR failed the
 kernel will hung up

Hi,

	I'm testing 4.0-rc1 kernel on my board with 8250 Designware UART.(ARM Cortex-a15 single core).
	
	I found if serial is busy and writes to the LCR failed after tried 1000 times.
	The kernel will hung up.

	The system boot success after changed from:

 95 static void dw8250_serial_out(struct uart_port *p, int offset, int value)
 96 {
 97         struct dw8250_data *d = p->private_data;
 98
...
...
112                         writeb(value, p->membase + (UART_LCR << p->regshift));
113                 }
114                 dev_err(p->dev, "Couldn't set LCR to %d\n", value);
115         }
116 }

	to:

 95 static void dw8250_serial_out(struct uart_port *p, int offset, int value)
 96 {
 97         struct dw8250_data *d = p->private_data;
 98
...
...
112                         writeb(value, p->membase + (UART_LCR << p->regshift));
113                 }
114                 dev_info(p->dev, "Couldn't set LCR to %d\n", value);            //changed here
115         }
116 }

	The reason is serial8250_console_write can't get port->lock because serial8250_do_set_termios has
	got port->lock.
	So i think here we should change from dev_err to dev_info ?
	Any suggestions are welcome.

Best regards!

	

	

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ