lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54F97456.2070102@huawei.com>
Date:	Fri, 6 Mar 2015 17:33:10 +0800
From:	"Chentao (Boby)" <boby.chen@...wei.com>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
CC:	<jgross@...e.com>, <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
	<boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>, <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
	<xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>, <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <wu.wubin@...wei.com>,
	<rudy.zhangmin@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] xen-scsiback: use DRV_PFX in the pr macros and DPRINTK



On 2015/3/5 0:32, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-03-04 at 18:32 +0000, Tao Chen wrote:
>> Defined the string of {xen-pvscsi: } as DRV_PFX, then use it in the pr sentences and DPRINTK.
>> Also fixed up some comments just as eliminate redundant white spaces and format the code.
>> These will make the code easier to read.
>
> It'd probaby be better just to use pr_fmt
> before any include and remove all the DRV_PRV uses
>
> #define pr_fmt(fmt) "xen-pvscsi: " fmt
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/xen/xen-scsiback.c b/drivers/xen/xen-scsiback.c
> []
>> @@ -69,8 +69,10 @@
>>   #include <xen/interface/grant_table.h>
>>   #include <xen/interface/io/vscsiif.h>
>>
>> +#define DRV_PFX "xen-pvscsi: "
>>   #define DPRINTK(_f, _a...)			\
>> -	pr_debug("(file=%s, line=%d) " _f, __FILE__ , __LINE__ , ## _a)
>> +	pr_debug(DRV_PFX "(file=%s, line=%d) " _f,	\
>> +			__FILE__ , __LINE__ , ## _a)
>
> I'd also remove DPRINTK and just use pr_debug directly
> as dynamic_debug can emit file and line as desired.
>

Joe, your suggested code is like below

#ifdef pr_fmt
#undef pr_fmt
#endif
#define pr_fmt(fmt) "xen-pvscsi: " fmt

Then replace all DPRINTK with pr_debug.

Am I right?


>> @@ -84,7 +86,7 @@ struct ids_tuple {
>>
>>   struct v2p_entry {
>>   	struct ids_tuple v;		/* translate from */
>> -	struct scsiback_tpg *tpg;	/* translate to   */
>> +	struct scsiback_tpg *tpg;	/* translate to */
>
> superfluous change.
>
>
>
> .
>

I'm sorry, I made a mistake here. I will modify it in my next patch.

Thanks, Joe.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ