[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150306093212.GB14982@hori1.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp>
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 09:32:12 +0000
From: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
CC: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Junichi Nomura <j-nomura@...jp.nec.com>,
Kiyoshi Ueda <k-ueda@...jp.nec.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] x86: mce: kexec: switch MCE handler for kexec/kdump
On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 10:27:38AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 09:09:30AM +0000, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> > I'm not sure why that works, could you elabroate it?
>
> Because the _safe() variants are only for handling reads to possibly
> non-existent MSRs. The _STATUS MSRs which you're accessing are
> guaranteed to be present, otherwise __mcheck_cpu_cap_init() would've
> disabled MCA on the first kernel, thus the mca_cfg.disabled check.
Great, thanks.
> We can always switch to the _safe() variants later if really needed - I
> just don't see the need for them right now.
OK, I'll do with rdmsrl().
Thanks,
Naoya Horiguchi--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists