lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1425635874-19087-63-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com>
Date:	Fri,  6 Mar 2015 09:55:53 +0000
From:	Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc:	Jeff Layton <jlayton@...marydata.com>,
	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...marydata.com>,
	Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.16.y-ckt 062/183] nfs: don't call blocking operations while !TASK_RUNNING

3.16.7-ckt8 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...marydata.com>

commit 6ffa30d3f734d4f6b478081dfc09592021028f90 upstream.

Bruce reported seeing this warning pop when mounting using v4.1:

     ------------[ cut here ]------------
     WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 1121 at kernel/sched/core.c:7300 __might_sleep+0xbd/0xd0()
    do not call blocking ops when !TASK_RUNNING; state=1 set at [<ffffffff810ff58f>] prepare_to_wait+0x2f/0x90
    Modules linked in: rpcsec_gss_krb5 auth_rpcgss nfsv4 dns_resolver nfs lockd grace sunrpc fscache ip6t_rpfilter ip6t_REJECT nf_reject_ipv6 xt_conntrack ebtable_nat ebtable_broute bridge stp llc ebtable_filter ebtables ip6table_nat nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6 nf_nat_ipv6 ip6table_mangle ip6table_security ip6table_raw ip6table_filter ip6_tables iptable_nat nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_defrag_ipv4 nf_nat_ipv4 nf_nat nf_conntrack iptable_mangle iptable_security iptable_raw snd_hda_codec_generic snd_hda_intel snd_hda_controller snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_pcm snd_timer ppdev joydev snd virtio_console virtio_balloon pcspkr serio_raw parport_pc parport pvpanic floppy soundcore i2c_piix4 virtio_blk virtio_net qxl drm_kms_helper ttm drm virtio_pci virtio_ring ata_generic virtio pata_acpi
    CPU: 1 PID: 1121 Comm: nfsv4.1-svc Not tainted 3.19.0-rc4+ #25
    Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.7.5-20140709_153950- 04/01/2014
     0000000000000000 000000004e5e3f73 ffff8800b998fb48 ffffffff8186ac78
     0000000000000000 ffff8800b998fba0 ffff8800b998fb88 ffffffff810ac9da
     ffff8800b998fb68 ffffffff81c923e7 00000000000004d9 0000000000000000
    Call Trace:
     [<ffffffff8186ac78>] dump_stack+0x4c/0x65
     [<ffffffff810ac9da>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8a/0xc0
     [<ffffffff810aca65>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x55/0x70
     [<ffffffff810ff58f>] ? prepare_to_wait+0x2f/0x90
     [<ffffffff810ff58f>] ? prepare_to_wait+0x2f/0x90
     [<ffffffff810dd2ad>] __might_sleep+0xbd/0xd0
     [<ffffffff8124c973>] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x243/0x430
     [<ffffffff810d941e>] ? groups_alloc+0x3e/0x130
     [<ffffffff810d941e>] groups_alloc+0x3e/0x130
     [<ffffffffa0301b1e>] svcauth_unix_accept+0x16e/0x290 [sunrpc]
     [<ffffffffa0300571>] svc_authenticate+0xe1/0xf0 [sunrpc]
     [<ffffffffa02fc564>] svc_process_common+0x244/0x6a0 [sunrpc]
     [<ffffffffa02fd044>] bc_svc_process+0x1c4/0x260 [sunrpc]
     [<ffffffffa03d5478>] nfs41_callback_svc+0x128/0x1f0 [nfsv4]
     [<ffffffff810ff970>] ? wait_woken+0xc0/0xc0
     [<ffffffffa03d5350>] ? nfs4_callback_svc+0x60/0x60 [nfsv4]
     [<ffffffff810d45bf>] kthread+0x11f/0x140
     [<ffffffff810ea815>] ? local_clock+0x15/0x30
     [<ffffffff810d44a0>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x250/0x250
     [<ffffffff81874bfc>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
     [<ffffffff810d44a0>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x250/0x250
    ---[ end trace 675220a11e30f4f2 ]---

nfs41_callback_svc does most of its work while in TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE,
which is just wrong. Fix that by finishing the wait immediately if we've
found that the list has something on it.

Also, we don't expect this kthread to accept signals, so we should be
using a TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE sleep instead. That however, opens us up
hung task warnings from the watchdog, so have the schedule_timeout
wake up every 60s if there's no callback activity.

Reported-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...marydata.com>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...marydata.com>
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
---
 fs/nfs/callback.c | 8 +++++---
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfs/callback.c b/fs/nfs/callback.c
index 073b4cf67ed9..0a2016bd6e58 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/callback.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/callback.c
@@ -128,22 +128,24 @@ nfs41_callback_svc(void *vrqstp)
 		if (try_to_freeze())
 			continue;
 
-		prepare_to_wait(&serv->sv_cb_waitq, &wq, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
+		prepare_to_wait(&serv->sv_cb_waitq, &wq, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
 		spin_lock_bh(&serv->sv_cb_lock);
 		if (!list_empty(&serv->sv_cb_list)) {
 			req = list_first_entry(&serv->sv_cb_list,
 					struct rpc_rqst, rq_bc_list);
 			list_del(&req->rq_bc_list);
 			spin_unlock_bh(&serv->sv_cb_lock);
+			finish_wait(&serv->sv_cb_waitq, &wq);
 			dprintk("Invoking bc_svc_process()\n");
 			error = bc_svc_process(serv, req, rqstp);
 			dprintk("bc_svc_process() returned w/ error code= %d\n",
 				error);
 		} else {
 			spin_unlock_bh(&serv->sv_cb_lock);
-			schedule();
+			/* schedule_timeout to game the hung task watchdog */
+			schedule_timeout(60 * HZ);
+			finish_wait(&serv->sv_cb_waitq, &wq);
 		}
-		finish_wait(&serv->sv_cb_waitq, &wq);
 	}
 	return 0;
 }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ