[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.11.1503061059070.15786@eddie.linux-mips.org>
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 11:08:16 +0000 (GMT)
From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>
To: Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@...omium.org>
cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Provide fallback reboot/poweroff/halt
implementations
On Wed, 4 Mar 2015, Andrew Bresticker wrote:
> If a machine-specific hook is not implemented for restart, poweroff,
> or halt, fall back to halting secondary CPUs, disabling interrupts,
> and spinning. In the case of restart, attempt to restart the system
> via do_kernel_restart() (which will call any registered restart
> handlers) before halting.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@...omium.org>
> ---
> arch/mips/kernel/reset.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/reset.c b/arch/mips/kernel/reset.c
> index 07fc524..87b1f08 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/kernel/reset.c
> +++ b/arch/mips/kernel/reset.c
> @@ -29,16 +29,36 @@ void machine_restart(char *command)
> {
> if (_machine_restart)
> _machine_restart(command);
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> + smp_send_stop();
> +#endif
> + do_kernel_restart(command);
> + pr_emerg("Reboot failed -- System halted\n");
> + local_irq_disable();
> + while (1);
I think it would make sense to put WAIT or suchlike in the final loop
so that such a halted system does not suck power unnecessarily. I think
bits in arch/mips/kernel/idle.c should do, after some massaging. As the
next step perhaps, don't treat it as a NACK for this change.
Maciej
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists