[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdaGtMmb5mNFK9Fbf29gWKRc3DM2SduM+9aQetcz_az1Gw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 12:23:11 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>,
Hans Holmberg <hans.holmberg@...el.com>,
Benjamin Adler <benadler@....net>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] pinctrl: baytrail: Rework interrupt handling
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 1:53 PM, Mika Westerberg
<mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> Instead of handling everything in the driver's first level interrupt
> handler, we can take advantage of already existing flow handlers that are
> provided by the IRQ core.
>
> This changes the functionality a bit also. Previously the driver looped
> over pending interrupts in a single loop, restarting the loop if some
> interrupt changed state. This caused problem with Lenovo Thinkpad 10
> digitizer that it was not able to deassert the interrupt before the driver
> disabled the interrupt for good (looplimit was exhausted).
>
> Rework the interrupt handling logic a bit so that we provide proper mask,
> ack and unmask operations in terms of Baytrail GPIO hardware and loop over
> pending interrupts only once. If the interrupt remains asserted the first
> level handler will be re-triggered automatically.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Patch applied for fixes.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists