lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPvkgC1Af0ox8cujTyd0bCYWvJVqyXh-vsRZJ7FG4Zdw1SzEmg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 6 Mar 2015 11:39:44 +0000
From:	Steve Capper <steve.capper@...aro.org>
To:	David Long <dave.long@...aro.org>
Cc:	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Sandeepa Prabhu <sandeepa.prabhu@...aro.org>,
	William Cohen <wcohen@...hat.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	"Jon Medhurst (Tixy)" <tixy@...aro.org>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
	Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/6] arm64: kprobes instruction simulation support

On 17 February 2015 at 23:11, David Long <dave.long@...aro.org> wrote:
> From: Sandeepa Prabhu <sandeepa.prabhu@...aro.org>
>
> Kprobes needs simulation of instructions that cannot be stepped
> from different memory location, e.g.: those instructions
> that uses PC-relative addressing. In simulation, the behaviour
> of the instruction is implemented using a copy of pt_regs.
>
> Following instruction catagories are simulated:
>  - All branching instructions(conditional, register, and immediate)
>  - Literal access instructions(load-literal, adr/adrp)
>
> Conditional execution is limited to branching instructions in
> ARM v8. If conditions at PSTATE do not match the condition fields
> of opcode, the instruction is effectively NOP. Kprobes considers
> this case as 'miss'.
>
> Thanks to Will Cohen for assorted suggested changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sandeepa Prabhu <sandeepa.prabhu@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: William Cohen <wcohen@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: David A. Long <dave.long@...aro.org>
> ---

Hi,
Apologies for looking at these late (I was on holiday).

I've applied this series on top of 3.19, but I get the following compile error:
arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes-arm64.c:23:34: fatal error:
probes-simulate-insn.h: No such file or directory
 #include "probes-simulate-insn.h"
                                  ^
compilation terminated.
scripts/Makefile.build:257: recipe for target
'arch/arm64/kernel/kprobes-arm64.o' failed

Is something missing from this patch?

Cheers,
--
Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ