lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150306114413.GM21293@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Fri, 6 Mar 2015 11:44:13 +0000
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	leroy christophe <christophe.leroy@....fr>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
	linux-spi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: fsl-spi: use of_iomap() to map parameter ram on CPM1

On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 09:00:39AM +0100, leroy christophe wrote:
> Le 03/03/2015 19:44, Mark Brown a écrit :

> >Why are we using of_iomap() rather than a generic I/O mapping function
> >here?

> because all drivers for powerpc seems to be using of_iomap(), as on powerpc
> the HW is described by the bootloader in a OF device tree.
> Today, of_iomap() is at least used in FSL SPI, FSL UART, SPI mpc52xx, UART
> mpc52xx, i2c-mpc, i2c-cpm, freescale ethernet drivers, etc ....

> Is it not correct ?

It's legacy, all that code is really old.  Modern code is written in as
architecture and firmware neutral a fashion as possible to make things
more consistent and maintainable.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ